Showing posts with label AirMagnet. Show all posts
Showing posts with label AirMagnet. Show all posts

Friday, September 27, 2013

Surveying for Gigabit WiFi is no Fluke #WFD5

DSC09126
Fluke announced their new 802.11ac site survey capabilities with the latest version of AirMagnet Survey PRO at Wireless Field Day 5.

According to AirMagnet, the client cards they used to do the testing (Edimax & Trendnet) showed vast differences between the adapters, but there was no repeatable reason for why the testing was so different. 


Introduction to Fluke Networks Wi-Fi with Chia-Chee Kuan at WFD5 from Stephen Foskett on Vimeo.

Fluke will be offering a free upgrade to the new 802.11ac software for Gold support customers, and AirMagnet Planner will have 802.11ac capabilities - but it will come after Survey PRO has been released to support 802.11ac. Beta testing of the Survey PRO is currently under way.

At the time of #WFD5 AirMagnet couldn't work in promiscuous mode with any 802.11ac adapters. There was no schedule that could be discussed in public, but it is a work in progress.

The RF coverage heat map is designed to show primary and secondary overlap of channel allocation. The heat map will show in yellow where the secondary channels overlap and this is where wireless speeds will fall back to slower data rates instead of the higher 802.11ac rates.


Fluke Networks Introduces Survey Pro with 802.11ac at Wireless Field Day 5 from Stephen Foskett on Vimeo.

Their AirMapper tool hasn't been updated for use on any 801.11ac phones/devices yet. Some 802.11ac phones are already available in AsiaPac and the UK, but none are for sale stateside yet. These new devices will be migrated into Airmapper soon.



The thing I found most interesting about their WFD5 presentation was the off the record presentation about their not-yet-released (but it is now) product called AirMagnet Spectrum ES. This application takes the user interface you know from the AirMagnet Spectrum XT application and brings it into the world of cellular Wi-Fi. 

I put together a playlist of all the demo videos they've uploaded to YouTube. It's well worth checking out. From what I can find, it seems the retail price for ES will be around $6k which is a veritable bargain compared to the average cellular testing tool which can cost $14K!


Thursday, January 24, 2013

Sometimes I think we're not speaking the same language!

Listening is a key skill for IT consultants, but I find myself more often trying to understand what the customer really expects when they say they need a 'site survey'.

A 'site survey' can mean quite a few different things and there isn't a standards body to formulate and finalize standard descriptions of site survey terms. 

Active, passive, predictive, validation, simulated and budgetary are all words I've heard used to describe the type of site survey a customer wanted.

The first pieces of information I need to get are: 

  • Does the customer have an existing wireless deployment?
    • Do they want their current RF coverage documented, then augmented?
      • If augmentation is desired, existing access point power would need to be reduced to ~25mW before documenting the RF coverage
      • Augmentation may not be the best solution due to the potentially vast differences in their current access point hardware and antennas vs. the features available in today's access points.
    • Do they want to deploy a new wireless coverage design and disregard their current deployment?
  • What does the customer intend to do with their wireless infrastructure?
    • What types of client devices do they anticipate?
    • What kinds of applications will be used?
    • Is there the potential for high-density user counts? 
    • Is any level of real-time location tracking required? 
Each deployment is different as a result of the building type, building layout, client use cases and customer budget. There are a great deal of questions that need answers before you can accurately define the type of site survey the customer needs.

Defining the different site survey terms is often problematic. Everyone seems to have their own idea of what an 'active' or a 'passive' site survey means. These are the terms I use to describe site surveys:
  • Active (also known as AP-on-a-stick)
    • Digital floor plans are obtained and scaled to a known distance.
      • If the floor plans do not have a scale indicated, the scale of the drawings can be obtained by Google Earth measurements or by using a laser distance measurement tool when on site at the facility.
    • The RF engineer brings in the actual access point the customer will purchase, powers the access point with a battery pack and documents the coverage of the access point in the actual installation location with the site survey software of choice. The access point installation locations can be surveyed one at a time and then merged, or multiple access points can be surveyed at a time (depending on the hardware resources available to the RF engineer)
      • This type of survey will not give you accurate data on the RF noise floor that will be present once the final access point infrastructure is installed and operational, as there are a limited number of access points transmitting during the survey period.
    • A Spectrum analysis should also be performed to determine if there are any major fixed sources of interference present in the facility.
  • Passive (also known as validation)
    • Digital floor plans are obtained and scaled to a known distance.
      • If the floor plans do not have a scale indicated, the scale of the drawings can be obtained by Google Earth measurements or by using a laser distance measurement tool when on site at the facility.
    • The RF engineer walks the facility with the survey laptop detecting one or more SSIDs in use at the customer site.
      • The RF engineer may not have access to network credentials to authenticate the the customer's WLAN and would only document the RSSI/SNR detected by the site survey application.
      • If the RF engineer has network credentials to associate/authenticate to the WLAN, additional testing of throughput/load/voice quality could be performed at the customers request.
    •  Spectrum analysis should also be performed to determine if there are any major fixed sources of interference present in the facility.
  • Predictive
    • Digital floor plans are obtained and scaled to a known distance.
      • If the floor plans do not have a scale indicated, the scale of the drawings can be obtained by Google Earth measurements of the outside wall of the building, or by using known distances common to corporate facilities (doorways are typically 3 feet wide).
    • RF obstacles are drawn in the RF simulation application
    • A software model of the access point's RF coverage is used to place the access point at a given location in the floor plan drawing and predict what the coverage for that access point would be given the RF obstacles drawn by the RF engineer.
    • Once the desired coverage level is achieved, a bill of materials can be generated
    • NOTE: Predictive surveys are not 100% accurate and a post-deployment verification survey should be performed to ensure the desired coverage was achieved through the predictive survey process.
  • Throughput/load test
    • There are several methods to performing throughput testing (this list is just an example and is not all inclusive)
    • The RF engineer would associate/authenticate the wireless client to the customer WLAN with credentials provided by the customer.
    • The RF engineer would also need access to a wired port to do end-to-end testing from a wired client to a wireless client.
  • Voice quality test
Hopefully the more we all talk about the different types of site surveys and learn from one another about the words we use to describe them, we'll all encounter less RFPs/RFQs asking for validation surveys for wireless infrastructures that aren't installed in buildings that aren't built yet.



Wednesday, May 23, 2012

AirMagnet Laptop Analyzer Using Multiple Proxim USB Adapters with Spectrum XT Integration

I've recently had the ability to use multiple Proxim/Orinoco 8494-US  wireless adapters with the AirMagnet WiFi Analyzer Pro application with the AirMagnet Spectrum XT integrated into the same application interface.


When you use three Proxim/Orinoco 8494-US wireless adapters with WiFi Analyzer pro, you're able to capture data on channels 1, 6 and 11 simultaneously, as well as do roaming testing with the three adapter cards. What you cannot do, is test the 5GHz wireless frequencies when you're using the three adapter cards. I imagine this is because the application locks the cards into using 1, 6 and 11 only during the testing. It would be nice if you were able to use a fourth card to detect signals on the 5GHz frequencies while you were checking 1, 6 and 11 at the same time.

I made a video of my findings while using the application. In it I explain the information shown in the application when it is used in conjunction with the AirMagnet Spectrum XT card. It does make it simpler to use both tools at the same time, since you can walk the area you're surveying just once, and then analyze the data collected. Sometimes I still prefer to use just the Spectrum XT application by itself so that I can concentrate on the spectrum data being shown by the application. Blending the two applications is certainly a time saver.


I hope you find the video helpful, and I look forward to hearing your thoughts on things I described, or let me know if I left things out that you think I should have covered.





Saturday, August 20, 2011

AirMagnet Site Survey Pro Comparison to TamoGraph Site Survey

TamoGraph Site Survey


Back in June I received a license for the TamoGraph Site Survey application courtesy of Michael Berg from @TamoSoft. I told them I'd give the application a try and see how it compared to the features I was familiar with in AirMagnet Survey Pro.




I had done a previous compare/contrast with the Ekahau Survey application, but I did not have the TamoGraph software at the time to do a three way comparison.


Several months went by before I had a good indoor survey opportunity to use for the comparison of TamoGraph against AirMagnet. It has then taken me a couple of weeks to find the time to edit the Camtasia video and add a narration audio track to accompany the visual demonstration.


I used the TamoGraph Site Survey application to survey a smaller section of a much larger building  - just large enough to get some good survey data. Using the TamoGraph application was pretty straight forward. The first step was to load the correct driver for my Proxim 8494 USB card for the TamoGraph application. This was as easy as clicking Help > Driver Installation Guide, and then choosing which wireless card I wanted to use with the TamoGraph application.


I did have some problems when trying to use the Intel 6200 AGN card, so I opted to do the comparison by using the same Proxim USB wireless card for both site survey applications.


Starting a new survey is done by clicking 'New Project', defining where you want to store your files, (next), choosing the environment type, choosing measurements in feet or meters and choosing to extrapolate the data beyond the guess range of _X_ feet/meters. Then you choose the scan settings for the 2.4 & 5GHz frequencies (next), then load the floor plan image. The last thing you do before you begin surveying is to scale the drawing to a known distance. For this small demonstration I used a three foot doorway. It is advisable to use a longer known distance than a mere three feet. Using Google Earth can give you the outer dimensions of the building, or you can use a laser tool to measure an wall span within the building.
TamoGraph Site Survey Project Wizard - Environment Type
TamoGraph Site Survey Project Wizard - Scanner Settings


There are several requirements presets that you can choose from in order to determine if the current wireless deployment meets certain 'success metrics'. Each of these requirement presets can be edited and saved as custom presets.




The display options in TamoGraph site survey were very similar to those of AirMagnet. I am including screen captures for each of the applications' drop down menus below.
TamoGraph Visualizations
AirMagnet Menu
AirMagnet Menu (expanded)
AirMagnet Menu (expanded)
There is the ability to change the AP detection and placement on the map. By default TamoGraph will approximate the AP installation location based upon the RSSI detected by the application. This location information is not always accurate since RSSI can fluctuate a bit.


The version of TamoGraph I was using (ver 2.0 Build 44) has a known issue with displaying the manufacturer name of newer Cisco access points. The non-identification problem was caused by the fact that their MACs begin with 88:F0:77, an OUI assigned by IEEE to Cisco very recently. This OUI was missing from the list of OUIs that comes with TamoGraph. The new file will also be included in the next TamoGraph release. Also, the ability to list the AP name will be included in the next release of the TamoGraph Site Survey application.


In order to work around this - I placed the APs exactly where they were located by standing directly under an AP and watching the AP list to see which AP had the strongest signal strength. Then I could place the location of that AP exactly.


Pausing the survey is not possible, instead you simply stop collecting data by clicking the stop button, and then begin collecting data again when you're ready to do so. This is essentially the same as pausing the survey, but just going about it in a different manner.


The survey data looked different from AirMagnet (naturally), but the actual RSSI and SNR values that were detected by each application were the same. There were some things I would have to get used to that the TamoGraph survey accomplished differently. Such as pausing/stopping the survey, having to select the APs you want included in the reporting, and the inaccurate auto placement.  I think if I were to use TamoGraph as my main site survey tool it would suffice for collecting RSSI and SNR data, but I would most likely turn off the auto AP placement.


The display option of  'AP Coverage Areas' looked a little strange to me, and perhaps it would make more sense if the area I was surveying wasn't covered by so many different APs. It seems that the coverage cell for a given AP is indicated as a colored line on the map. I'm not sure if this display would be useful in a densely populated RF environment, but it was an interesting RF display map. It reminded me of some Visios I had to create for a customer once upon a time.




The new features that will be available in TamoGraph Site Survey 2.1 are listed here. According to this information the ability to do predictive planning will be available in a few months.


The YouTube video I uploaded showing the differences between AirMagnet and TamoGraph is here:


The TamoGraph Site Survey application without GPS support is priced at $749 and with GPS support is $999. By comparison, the AirMagnet Site Survey Pro application is priced at $3995 including the Planner module and $1990 without the Planner module.


All in all, I was impressed by the features present in the version of TamoGraph that I worked with. I think that the RSSI/SNR data that was recorded within TamoGraph was just as accurate as that within AirMagnet. For companies on a budget, the TamoGraph application would be a worthy investment.